Some atom nuclei split into two parts (nuclear fission) - not usually equal ones but always into two - giving two smaller fission fragments. Not
all atoms do this, only ones that are really unstable. Heat
energy is released when an atom nucleus splits .
Uranium-235
atoms can be made to undergo fission. They are a store of nuclear
(or atomic) energy that we can use as a fuel. The heat produced is used
commercially to produce electricity in nuclear power stations. The heat
energy is used to boil water and the pressure of the steam produced is
used to turn turbines which operate electrical generators and make electricity.
Revision of basics:
Click on graphic to enlarge
- Isotopes of an element have
the same number of protons in the nucleus (therefore they are the
same element and have the same chemical properties as each other).
They have different numbers of neutrons in their nucleus, so they
have different physical properties.
- Some isotopes are radioactive.They
are inherently unstable and give out a,
b
or g
rays.
- There is no such thing as
a 'normal' isotope
but there might be a 'common' one.

The splitting of the
atomic nucleus (nuclear fission) produces a lot of energy.This can then
be used to make electricity from the heat extracted from a nuclear reactor (by using it to boil water, producing
steam, the pressure from which can be used to turn turbines (so that electricity
can be produced by electromagnetic
induction)).
This is called nuclear power or atomic power.
Nuclear Power
In a nuclear power plant
use is made of this fission reaction.
A nuclear reactor is a device in which nuclear
chain reactions are initiated, controlled, and sustained at a steady rate.
The energy released is used to heat water, making steam, the pressure
from which can be used to turnturbines and produce electricity (by electromagnetic
induction ).
Chain
reaction - using the neutrons made by fission to instigate a new fission
Because a neutron
is needed to instigate a fission (splitting) and neutrons are produced
as the product of a fission, these products can go on to produce more
fissions,the neutrons produced in which can go on to produce more fissions
etc.etc. Each stage is therefore linked to the previous one and therefore
is termed a chain reaction.
The only problem with
the chain reaction is the fact that each stage of the reaction instigates
more than twice as many fissions as the next stage (almost three times
as many!).This results in the amount of energy produced at each stage
more than doubling if the reaction is left unchecked. Each stage occurs
in less than a millionth of a second therefore the heat energy produced
can be phenomenal.The reaction is said to escalate. If we requirea steady
energy output of energy only one neutron from each fission should be allowed
to go on to make another fission reaction. The reaction needs to be controlled.
Controlling
the energy output of the reactor
Boron is a very good
absorber of neutrons. It is said to have 'a high cross section for neutrons'.
Rods of boron (or cadmium - it has a high cross section for neutrons too)
are lowered into the reaction-vessel enough to absorb a sufficient quantity
of the neutrons produced by fission so that only about one of those produced
in a split goes on to instigate a new fission. If more energy is required
by the power station, the rods can be lifted out of the vessel (allowing
more neutrons to cause fission). If les senergy is required they can be
lowered deep into the vessel (mopping up more neutrons). If they are pushed
right in, they can mop up enough neutrons to prevent the chain reaction
from continuing; this will result in shutting down the reactor safely.
These rods are called control rods because they control the energy
output of the reactor.
Moderating
the speed of neutrons so that efficient fission occurs
Efficient fission
occurs if the bombarding neutrons are likely to stay in the nucleus and
cause the instability that results in a fission (split).This is only the
case is they are of thermal energy (slow). The neutrons resulting from
the fission are usually of too high a kinetic energy to interact with
the nucleus successfully and therefore need their speed moderating
before they will have a high probability of producing a fission. Graphite
is therefore included in the reaction vessel. It is an excellent moderator.It
takes energy out of the neutrons (thereby slowing them down) as they interact
with the carbon atom lattice(3-d bonded structure of graphite) but is
does not absorb too many of them. It is said to have a 'low cross-section
for neutrons '.
It is called a moderator because it moderates the speed of the neutrons.
At A2 level you
should be able to:
- label a diagram
of a nuclear reactor
- know that U235
is the isotope that undergoes fission
- remember the
nuclear equations for fission
- explain what
a chain reaction is
- explain the
purpose of a moderator
- explain the
purpose of control rods
- name the material
used for a moderator
- name the material
used for control rods
- know why thick
concrete shielding is needed
Power
in the UK
Several types of nuclear
reactor have been built in Britain. Commercial reactors commissioned between
1956 and 1973 were of the gas-cooled Magnox design. Between 1976 and 1988,
seven advanced gas-cooled reactors (AGRs) were built.
The latest power station constructed, at
Sizewell in Suffolk, is a Pressurised Water Reactor (PWR), which is the
type of reactor most commonly used throughout the world. This 1188 MW
reactor first supplied electricity to the grid in February 1995. A heavy
water reactor at Winfrith and a fastbreeder (FBR) at Dounreay (both closed)
were experimental reactors operatedby the AtomicEnergy Authority.
Safety
Considerations
Irradiated fuel is
highly radioactive and is kept carefully segregated. The radioactivity
decays with time and initially the rate of decay is very rapid. Ultimately
the spent fuel can be either placed in a long-term store, possibly for
several decades, or transferred to a reprocessing plant at Sellafield,
where reusable uraniumand plutonium is separated out from high level waste.
A vitrification (converting
the waste into a large glass block) plant at Sellafield enables
reprocessed high level waste to be solidified in glass blocks, sealed
in stainlesssteel cans and placed in a carefully controlled storage facility.
In its 1995 Policy Review the Government concluded that underground disposal
was the favoured option for the long-term management of vitrified high
level waste and reported that it was putting in hand development of a
research strategy, with the aim of producing a statement of future intent
in this area. It also concluded that a repository for the disposal of
low and intermediate level radioactive waste should be constructed as
soon as reasonably practicable. In the meantime disposal of low level waste
by shallow burial at the Drigg site in Cumbria would continue.
Very low levels of
radioactivity are released from nuclear plant in gaseous emissions via
stacks or in liquid effluent discharged to the sea. These releases are
kept below authorised limits set by the Environment Agencies, using a
variety of techniques,such as filtration and ion-exchange treatments.
These limits ensure thatthe levels of radioactivity released to the environment
are negligible compared with natural background levels. The discharges
are monitored by both the nuclear industry and the Ministry of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Food and the results of the monitoring are published regularly.
As a result of these controls, population radiation exposure due to discharges
from a nuclear power station is about the same as that due to the emissions
from a coal-fired station, arising from the tracesof natural radioactivity
in the coal.
Everyone is exposed
to background radiation
from the sun and outer space and fromthe natural radioactivity in rocks,
soil, buildings and diet. Thesesources account for 85% of the average
person's annual radiation dose andmost ofthe rest comes from medical sources
such as X-rays.
The contribution from
nuclear industry discharges amounts to less than 0.1% of the total. Over
a yearthis amounts to less than the radiation dose received from eating
one brazilnut. (These nuts naturally accumulate radioactive elements from
the soilduring growth.)
Despite the rigorous
controlof radioactive discharges from power stations, it has been suggested
thatthese increase the risk of childhood leukaemia, and links have been
claimed at some nuclear sites. This suggested association has been the
subject of intensive research over the past decade. The latest authoritative
study in England and Wales by Oxford University researchers, published
in the British Medical Journal in 1994, used a very sensitive, new technique
for detecting raised incidence of disease near a suspectedsource of risk.
Whilst an excess of childhood leukaemia and related diseases near Sellafield
was clearly apparent, the authors concluded that there was no evidence
of a general increase of these diseases around nuclear installations.
A similar conclusion was reached in a recent study in Scotland. Other
possible explanations have been put forward toexplain the excess near
Sellafield, notably the Kinlen hypothesis that leukaemia is a rare response
to a common infection whose spread is facilitated by population mixing,
as in new towns, for example. Research is continuing worldwide into the
causative mechanisms for human leukaemia.
Environmental
Benefits of Nuclear Power
In its environmental
white paper, This Common Inheritance, 1990 (Cm 1200), and in its strategies
on Climate Change (Cm 2427) and Sustainable Development (Cm 2426) in 1994,
the Government recognised that nuclear power made a major contribution
to curbing acid rain and combating global warming. Nuclear stations emit
negligible quantities of the acid rain gases, sulphur dioxide (SO
2)and nitrogen oxides (NOx), and the greenhouse gas carbon
dioxide(CO2), a major contributor to global warming. Small amounts of
these gasesare emitted as a result of uranium mining, fuel processing
and transport, but this is negligible compared to the amount produced
from fossil fuels. Table 1 compares the full fuel cycle emissions for
the major fuels usedin generating electricity.
Emissions
in Grammes per kWh Delivered to Final Customer
|
Fuel
|
CH4
|
SO2
|
CO2
|
NOx
|
|
Coal
|
955
|
2.92
|
11.82*
|
4.34
|
|
Oil
|
818
|
0.17
|
14.16*
|
3.98
|
|
Gas (CCGT)
|
446
|
0.27
|
0.00
|
0.49
|
|
Nuclear
|
4
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.02
|
* No
flue gas desulphurisation
Source : Energy Technology
Support Unit
If all the electricity produced
by nuclear stations in 1995 had been generated by coal stations, the
UK'stotal CO2 emissions would have been 13%, or almost 20
milliontonnesof carbon (MtC), greater. Emissions of SO2 and
NOx wouldalso have been much higher. From 1990 to 1994, the output from
nuclearstations increased by 36%, thereby making CO2 emission
savingsagainst generationfrom coal equivalent to over 5 MtC per annum.
This isover half the 10 MtCreduction in annual national CO2
emissionsbetween 1990 and 2000,to which the UK is committed under the
UN ClimateChange Convention. In Francethe large nuclear programme of
the late 70sand 80s led to an 80% reductionin the annual CO2
emissionsfrom power stations within 7 years.
Decommissioning
and Disposal
When a nuclear power
stationcomes to the end of its useful life, decommissioning of the station
commenceswith the aim of eventually returning the site to alternative
uses with no nuclear legacy. Dismantling of the stationtakes place in
stages, taking full account of public safety in containingthe radioactivity
at all times. The nuclear companies' "safestore" decommissioningstrategyprovides
for reactor defuelling immediately after shutdown, taking 2-3 years and
removing 99.9% of the residual radioactivity. Demolition of non-radioactive
plant and buildingsand dismantling of some radioactive plant is then undertaken.
This is followed by the safe and secure maintenance of remaining structures
for up to 135 years before final dismantling and site clearance.This ensures
that radiation has fallen to a safe working level; it alsoreduces the
amount of radioactive waste.
In its Radioactive
Waste Management Policy Review, the Government acknowledged the suitability
of the safestore strategy. It required operators to submit their decommissioning
proposals every five years for review by the Health and Safety Executive,
in consultation with the Environment Agencies.
Whilst recognising
that the nuclear companies were in the process of making full provision
for decommissioning in their accounts, the Review nevertheless required
the establishment ofsegregated decommissioning funds for the privatised
parts of the industry.
The first commercial
UK reactor to be closed for decommissioning was the Magnox station at
Berkeley. Decommissioning work started in 1989 and is progressing to the
care and maintenance stage. The Magnox stations at Trawsfynydd in Snowdonia
and at Hunterston in Scotland are also being decommissioned; both have
been defuelled and work is continuing in line with the safestore strategy.
Minimising any adverse impacts onthe environment is a key objective throughout
this work.
Future
Technical Developments
Only 0.7% of natural
uranium consists of the fissile isotope U235. Existing reactors use enriched
uranium as fuel, in which the U235 fraction has been increased to 2-3½%.
During operation of these reactors some of the non-fissile uranium is
converted into plutonium.
A kilogram of plutonium-239
can release the explosive energy of 20,000 tons of TNT ,making it the
material of choice for fission weaponry. Plutonium was animportant ingredient
in the development and production of the first atomicbombs.
Plutonium is a highlytoxic
radioactive silvery element of the actinoid series ofmetals.It is a transuranium
element that has six known allotropic forms.The alpha-version is the one
that exists at normal environmental temperatures. It is silvery colour
that takes on a yellowish hue as it oxidises in theair.
Plutonium's commercial use is chiefly in
electric power reactors. It is extremely dangerous to handle, and operations
must be done by remote control and with adequate shielding.
An advanced type of
reactor, the Fast Breeder, is fuelled by plutonium extracted from the
spent fuel of existing reactors. As well as producing electricity, a fast
breeder can also convert depleted uranium, which cannot be used in conventionalreactors,
into further plutonium. It can thus produce more plutonium than it consumes,
providing additional fuel. In this way, a fast breeder can potentially
extract about 60 times as muchenergy from each tonne of uranium as present
reactors. If all the depleteduranium in storage in the UK were to be used
in fast breeder reactors,it could potentially provide as much electricity
as burning 20 billiontonnes of oil (about 7 times the UK's coal, oil and
gas reserves). A prototypefast breeder at Dounreay inScotland was closed
in 1994, but experimentalfast breeders continue operatingin France, Japan
and Russia. However,fastbreeder reactors are unlikely to be economic for
several decades. Anotherlong termenergy source, which is the subject of
research in the USA, Europeand Russia,is fusion power. In this process,heavy
hydrogennuclei are fused together to produce helium nuclei, withthe release
of largeamounts of energy. This is the main source of thesun's energy
output. Commercial fusion reactors are unlikely to be available until
the latter half of this century. |